ДИАГНОСТИЧЕСКАЯ ЦЕННОСТЬ ЛУЧЕВЫХ МЕТОДОВ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИИ В ВЫЯВЛЕНИИ ЛОКАЛЬНОГО РЕЦИДИВА РАКА ПРОСТАТЫ ПОСЛЕ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-68-78
Аннотация
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
Е. А. БезруковРоссия
Э. Л. Лачинов
Россия
Г. А. Мартиросян
Россия
Список литературы
1. Алгоритмыдиагностикиилечениязлокачественныхновообразований. Подред. Член-корр. НАНБелоруси, д.м.н., проф. И.В. Залуцкого, д.м.н., проф. Э.А. Жаврида //Минск, 2007. – С. 351-372.
2. Возможности различных методов медицинской визуализации в диагно- стике причин биохимического рецидива после радикальной простатэктомии по поводу рака предстательной железы / Богушевич Е.В., Демешко П.Д., Красный С.А., Ролевич А.И. // Онкологический журнал. 2009. Том 3,№ 1. С. 65-71.
3. Применение иммуносцинтиграфиивдиагностикеракапредстательнойжелезы (Ill- Индиякапромабпендетайд, ProstaScint) / АляевЮ.Г., Винаров А.З., Рапопорт J1.M., Безруков Е.А., Бутнару Д.В. // Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2004. № 3. С. 61-64.
4. A systematic review of the role of imaging before salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence / Beresford M.J., Gillatt D., Benson R.J., Ajithkumar T. // Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.). 2010. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 46-55.
5. 11 C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer / Oyama N., Akino H., Kanamaru H., Suzuki Y., Muramoto S., Yonekura Y., Sadato N., Yamamoto K., Okada K. // J. Nucl. Med. 2002. Vol. 43, N 2. P. 181-186.
6. Dynamic contrastenhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization / Jackson A.S., Reinsberg S.A., Sohaib S.A., Charles-Edwards E.M., Jhavar S., Christmas T.J., Thompson A.C., Bailey M.J., Corbishley C.M., Fisher C., Leach M.O., Dearnaley D.P. // Br. J. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 82, N 974. P. 148- 156.
7. Elgamal A.A., Troychak M.J., Murphy G.P. ProstaScint scan may enhance identification of prostate cancer recurrences after prostatectomy, radiation, or hormone therapy: Analysis of 136 scans of 100 patients // Prostate. 1998. Vol. 37, N4. P. 261-269.
8. Endorectal MRI assessment of local relapse after surgery for prostate cancer: a model to define treatment field guidelines for adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at high risk for local failure / Miralbell R., Vees H., Lozano J., Khan H., Molla M., Hidalgo A., Linero D., Rouzaud M. // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2007. Vol. 67, N 2. P. 356-361.
9. [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients / Cimitan M., Bortolus R., Morassut S., Canzonieri V., Garbeglio A., BaresicТ., Borsatti, Drigo A., Trovo M.G. // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2006. Vol. 33, N 12. P. 1387-1398.
10. 18F-choline and/or llCacetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostatespecific antigen values (<1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy / Vees H., Buchegger
11. Intraindividual comparison of [HC]acetate and [1 lCJcholine PET for detection of metastases of prostate cancer / Kotzerke J., Volkmer B.G., Glatting G., van den Hoff J., Gschwend J.E., Messer P., Reske S.N., Neumaier B. // Nuklearmedizin. 2003. Vol. 42, N 1. P. 25-30
12. Imaging procedures to diagnose prostate cancer / Seitz M., Scher A., Scherr M., Tilki D, Schlenker A., Gratzke C., Schipf A., Stanislaus P., Muller-Lisse U., Reich 0.,StiefC.//Urologe A. 2007. Vol. 46, N 10. P. 1435-1446.
13. Leventis А.Ё., Shariat S.F., Slawin K M. Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: correlation of US features with prostatic fossa biopsy findings // Radiology. 2001. Vol. 219, N 2. P. 432-439.
14. Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy / Kane C.J., Amling C.L., Johnstone P.A., Dae N„ Lance R.S., Thrasher J.В., Foley J.P., Riffenburgh R.H., Moul J.W. // Urology. 2003. Vol. 61, N 3. P. 607-611.
15. Petronis J.D, Regan F, Lin K. Indium-Illcapromabpendetide (ProstaScint) imaging to detect recurrent and metastatic prostate cancer // Clin. Nucl. Med. 1998. Vol. 23, N10. P. 672-677.
16. Preliminary imaging results using In-Ill labeled CYT-356 (Prostascint) in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer / Sodee D.B., Conant R., Chalfant M., Miron S., Klein E., Bahnson R., Spirnak J.P., Carlin A., Bellon E.M., Rogers B. // Clin. Nucl. Med. 1996. Vol. 21, N 10. P. 759- 767.
17. Radioimmunoscintigraphy with lllindium labeled capromabpendetide predicts prostate cancer response to salvage radiotherapy after failed radical prostatectomy / Kahn D., Williams R.D., Haseman M.K., Reed N.L., Miller S.J., Gerstbrein J. // J. Clin. Oncol. 1998. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 284- 289.
18. Raj G.V., Partin A.W., Polascik T.J. Clinical utility of indium 111- capro-mabpendetideImmunoscintigraphy in the detection of early, recurrent prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy // Cancer. 2002. Vol. 94, N 4. P. 987-996
19. Reske S.N, Blumstein N.M, Glatting G. [(1 l)C]choline PET/CT imaging in occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2008. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 9-17.
20. Role of whole-body 18F-choline PET/CT in disease detection in patients with biochemical relapse after radical treatment for prostate cancer / Pelosi E., Arena V., Skanjeti A., Pirro V., Douroukas A., Pupi A., Mancini M. // Radiol. Med. 2008. Vol. 113, N 6. P. 895-904.
21. Rouviere O., Vitry Ò., Lyonnet D. Imaging of prostate cancer local recurrences: why and how? // Eur. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 20, N 5. P. 1254-1266.
22. Sensitivity of computed tomography in detecting local recurrence of prostatic carcinoma following radical prostatectomy / Kramer S, Gorich J, Gottfried H.W, Riska P, Aschoff A.J, Rilinger N„ Brambs H.J, Sokiranski R. // Br. J. Radiol. 1997. Vol. 70, N 838. P. 995-999.
23. Silverman JM, Krebs TL. MR imaging evaluation with a transrectal surface coil of local recurrence of prostatic cancer in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997. Vol. 168, N2.P. 379-385.
24. Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging / Sella Ò., Schwartz L.H., Swindle P.W., Onyebuchi C.N., Scardino P.T., Scher H.I., Hricak H. // Radiology. 2004. Vol. 231, N 2. P. 379-385.
25. Stephenson A. J., Shariat S. F., Zelefsky M. J. et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy // JAMA. — 2004. Vol. 291, № 11. — Р. 1325–1332.
26. Transrectal US in evaluation of patients after radical prostatectomy. Part I. Normal postoperative anatomy / Wasserman N.F, Kapoor D.A, Hildebrandt W.C, Zhang G, Born K.M, Eppel S.M, Reddy P.K. // Radiology. 1992. Vol. 185, N 2. P. 361-366. (4,5)
27. Yield of imaging and scintigraphy assessing biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients / Johnstone P.A., Tarman G.J., Riffenburgh R., Rohde D.C., Puckett M.L., Kane C.J. // Urol. Oncol. 1997. Vol. 3, N 4. P. 108-112.(15)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Безруков Е.А., Лачинов Э.Л., Мартиросян Г.А. ДИАГНОСТИЧЕСКАЯ ЦЕННОСТЬ ЛУЧЕВЫХ МЕТОДОВ ВИЗУАЛИЗАЦИИ В ВЫЯВЛЕНИИ ЛОКАЛЬНОГО РЕЦИДИВА РАКА ПРОСТАТЫ ПОСЛЕ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ. Вестник урологии. 2015;(3):68-78. https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-68-78
For citation:
Bezrukov E.A., Lachinov E.L., Martirosyan G.A. DIAGNOSTIC CONSIDERATION OF RADIAL IMAGING METHODS IN IDENTIFYING LOCAL RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Urology Herald. 2015;(3):68-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2015-0-3-68-78